govandpolУправление и политикаGovernance and Politics2782-70622782-7070MGIMO University10.24833/2782-7062-2023-2-4-24-36govandpol-53Research ArticleМЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ ПОЛИТИКАINTERNATIONAL POLITICSПерспективы гуманитарной дипломатии стран БРИКС в Латинской Америке после расширения группыProspects for Humanitarian Diplomacy of the BRICS Countries in Latin America after the Expansion of the GroupДмитриеваВ. А.DmitrievaV. A.

Дмитриева Валентина Андреевна – аспирант кафедры мировых политических процессов

119454, Москва, пр. Вернадского, 76

Valentina A. Dmitrieva, Postgraduate Student of the Department of World Politics

dmitrieva.v.a@my.mgimo.ruМГИМО МИД РоссииРоссияMGIMO UniversityRussian Federation202302012024242436Copyright © Дмитриева В.А., 20242024Дмитриева В.А.Dmitrieva V.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.gp-mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/53

В августе 2023 г. к формату БРИКС присоединились еще шесть государств, многих из которых, как и страны пятерки, вовлечены в гуманитарную дипломатию. Статья направлена на выявление новых трендов гуманитарной дипломатии стран БРИКС с латиноамериканскими странами. Для выявления направлений двусторонней гуманитарной деятельности стран БРИКС используются базы данных AidData, пресс-релизы, вебсайты гуманитарных агентств и министерств иностранных дел. В процессе сопоставления составления данных систематизированы двусторонние (в некоторых случаях многосторонние) проекты с государствами Латинской Америки. Также были проанализированы двусторонние отношения стран БРИКС с государствами, не вовлеченными в сотрудничество, с целью выявления возможных противоречий. В результате показано, что среди первоначальных членов БРИКС все государства кроме ЮАР активно действуют на территории Латинской Америки, реализуя гуманитарные проекты с большинством государств региона. ЮАР продолжает получать помощь из крупных стран Латинской Америки, но не взаимодействует с регионом в качестве донора. Среди новых членов БРИКС выделяются три группы стран на основании активности их гуманитарной дипломатии в регионе: активно сотрудничающие с латиноамериканскими странами, сотрудничающие с отдельными государствами, государства с недостаточными ресурсами или недостаточной заинтересованностью в инвестировании в регион. У стран БРИКС, активно вовлеченных в гуманитарные связи с регионом, открывается пространство для развития многостороннего сотрудничества в гуманитарной сфере.

: In August, 2023, six more states joined the BRICS format, many of which, like the five previously cooperating countries, are involved in humanitarian diplomacy. The article aims to identify new trends in the BRICS countries’ humanitarian diplomacy with Latin American countries. AidData databases, press releases, websites of humanitarian agencies and foreign ministries are used to identify trends in the bilateral humanitarian activities of the BRICS countries. In the process of comparing data, the existence of bilateral (in some cases multilateral) projects with Latin American states has been systematized. The bilateral relations of BRICS countries with states excluded from humanitarian ties were also analysed in order to identify possible contradictions. As a result, it is shown that among the BRICS states, all states except South Africa are proactive in Latin America, implementing humanitarian projects with the majority of states in the region. South Africa continues to receive aid from major Latin American countries, but does not engage with the region as a donor. Among the new BRICS participants, three groups of countries are distinguished based on activity of their humanitarian diplomacy in the region: those actively cooperating with Latin American countries, those cooperating with individual states, and states with insufficient resources or insufficient interest in investing in the region. The BRICS countries that are actively involved in humanitarian ties with the region have room to develop multilateral cooperation in the humanitarian sphere.

гуманитарная дипломатияБРИКСИбероамерикаЛатинская Америкамеждународное гуманитарное сотрудничествогуманитарная политикаhumanitarian diplomacyBRICSIberoamericaLatin Americainternational humanitarian cooperationhumanitarian policyReferencesГромогласова Е.С. (2018). Гуманитарная дипломатия в современных международных отношениях: опыт системного исследования. М.: ИМЭМО РАН.Abdenur, A.E., Folly, M., Moura, K., Jordão, S.A.S., & Maia, P. (2014). The BRICS and the South Atlantic: Emerging arena for South–South cooperation. South African. Journal of International Affairs, 21(3), 303–319.Дмитриева В.А. (2022). Особенности гуманитарной дипломатии Мексики на современном этапе. Латинская Америка. № 9. С. 19–35.Alexander, C.R. (2014). Guatemala: Still Taiwan’s Friend? In China & Taiwan in Central America. Palgrave Macmillan Series in Global Public Diplomacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Кузнецов Д.А. (ред.). (2022). Практика современной гуманитарной дипломатии. М., Эдитус.Cochrane, L. (2021). The United Arab Emirates as a Global Donor: What a Decade of Foreign Aid Data Transparency Reveals. Development Studies Research, 8(1), 49–62.Custer, S., Dreher, A., Elston, T.B., Fuchs, A., Ghose, S., Lin, J., & Zhang, S. (2021). Tracking Chinese Development Finance: An Application of AidData’s TUFF 2.0 Methodology. Williamsburg, VA: AidData at William & Mary.Custer, S., Dreher, A., Elston, T.B., Fuchs, A., Ghose, S., Lin, J., & Zhang, S. (2021). Tracking Chinese Development Finance: An Application of AidData’s TUFF 2.0 Methodology. Williamsburg, VA: AidData at William & Mary.Deych, T. (2015). BRICS Regional Policy in Africa. International Organisations Research Journal, 10(2), 206–228.Deych, T. (2015). BRICS Regional Policy in Africa. International Organisations Research Journal, 10(2), 206–228.Fan, V.Y., Grépin, K., Shen, G., & Chen, L. (2014). Tracking the Flow of Health Aid from BRICS Countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(6), 457–458.Fan, V.Y., Grépin, K., Shen, G., & Chen, L. (2014). Tracking the Flow of Health Aid from BRICS Countries. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(6), 457–458.Guo, S., Sun, Yu., & Demidov, P. (2020). The Role of BRICS in International Development Assistance. International Organisations Research Journal, 15(2), 92-104.Guo, S., Sun, Yu., & Demidov, P. (2020). The Role of BRICS in International Development Assistance. International Organisations Research Journal, 15(2), 92-104.Li, Y. (2019). Saudi Arabia’s Economic Diplomacy through Foreign Aid: Dynamics, Objectives and Mode. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 13(1), 110–122.Li, Y. (2019). Saudi Arabia’s Economic Diplomacy through Foreign Aid: Dynamics, Objectives and Mode. Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, 13(1), 110–122.Naim, M. (2007). Rogue Aid. Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy; Washington.Naim, M. (2007). Rogue Aid. Foreign Policy. Foreign Policy; Washington.O’Hagan, J. (2016). Australia and the Promise and the Perils of Humanitarian Diplomacy. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(6), 657–669.O’Hagan, J. (2016). Australia and the Promise and the Perils of Humanitarian Diplomacy. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 70(6), 657–669.Ogden, C., & Prakash, T. (2023). India’s Foreign Aid to the Pacific: A Strategic Tool of Cooperation? In Global India: The pursuit of influence and status (pp. 191–207). Routledge.Ogden, C., & Prakash, T. (2023). India’s Foreign Aid to the Pacific: A Strategic Tool of Cooperation? In Global India: The pursuit of influence and status (pp. 191–207). Routledge.Pinto, R.F. (2020). International Development Assistance: A Case Study of Brazil, a Member of the BRICS. In J.A. Puppim de Oliveira & Y. Jing (Eds.), International Development Assistance and the BRICS. Singapore, Palgrave Macmillan.Pinto, R.F. (2020). International Development Assistance: A Case Study of Brazil, a Member of the BRICS. In J.A. Puppim de Oliveira & Y. Jing (Eds.), International Development Assistance and the BRICS. Singapore, Palgrave Macmillan.Roda, E.M., & Luiz, S.S. (2020). Tourism from Argentina in Uruguay: A Quantitative Behavioral Analysis. Cuadernos de Turismo, (45), 561–565.Roda, E.M., & Luiz, S.S. (2020). Tourism from Argentina in Uruguay: A Quantitative Behavioral Analysis. Cuadernos de Turismo, (45), 561–565.Tapscott, C., Jing, Y., & Puppim de Oliveira, J. (2019). BRICS and International Development Assistance towards Divergence or Convergence in Development Assistance amongst North and South Donors? Public Administration and Development, 39(4-5), 167–173.Tapscott, C., Jing, Y., & Puppim de Oliveira, J. (2019). BRICS and International Development Assistance towards Divergence or Convergence in Development Assistance amongst North and South Donors? Public Administration and Development, 39(4-5), 167–173.Tierney, M.J., Nielson, D.L., Hawkins, D.G., Timmons Roberts, J., Findley, M.G., Powers, R.M., Hicks, R.L. (2011). More Dollars than Sense: Refining Our Knowledge of Development Finance Using AidData. World Development, 39(11), 1891–1906.Tierney, M.J., Nielson, D.L., Hawkins, D.G., Timmons Roberts, J., Findley, M.G., Powers, R.M., Hicks, R.L. (2011). More Dollars than Sense: Refining Our Knowledge of Development Finance Using AidData. World Development, 39(11), 1891–1906.Dmitriyeva, V.A. (2022). Osobennosti gumanitarnoy diplomatii Meksiki na sovremennom etape [Features of humanitarian diplomacy in Mexico at the present stage]. Latinskaya Amerika, 9, 19–35.Dmitriyeva, V.A. (2022). Osobennosti gumanitarnoy diplomatii Meksiki na sovremennom etape [Features of humanitarian diplomacy in Mexico at the present stage]. Latinskaya Amerika, 9, 19–35.Gromoglasova, E.S. (2018). Gumanitarnaya diplomatiya v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh: opyt sistemnogo issledovaniya [Humanitarian diplomacy in modern international relations: experience of systemic research]. Moscow: IMEMO RAN.Gromoglasova, E.S. (2018). Gumanitarnaya diplomatiya v sovremennykh mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh: opyt sistemnogo issledovaniya [Humanitarian diplomacy in modern international relations: experience of systemic research]. Moscow: IMEMO RAN.Kuznetsov, D.A. (Ed.). (2022). Praktika sovremennoy gumanitarnoy diplomatii [The practice of modern humanitarian diplomacy]. Moscow, Editus.Kuznetsov, D.A. (Ed.). (2022). Praktika sovremennoy gumanitarnoy diplomatii [The practice of modern humanitarian diplomacy]. Moscow, Editus.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.