govandpolУправление и политикаGovernance and Politics2782-70622782-7070MGIMO University10.24833/2782-7062-2024-3-2-8-26govandpol-63Research ArticleМЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ ПОЛИТИКАINTERNATIONAL POLITICSРасширение БРИКС в российских и зарубежных экспертных оценкахExpansion of BRICS in Russian and Foreign Expert AssessmentsСеменоваМ. С.SemenovaM. S.

Семенова Мария Сергеевна – лаборант Центра комплексных европейских и международных исследований, стажер-исследователь Института военной экономики и военной стратегии 

119017, Россия, Москва, М. Ордынка ул., д. 17

Maria S. Semenova, Laboratory Assistant at the Center for Comprehensive European and International Studies, Research Intern at the Institute of Military Economics and Military Strategy

M. Ordynka st., 17, Moscow, Russia, 119017

mssemenova@hse.ruНациональный исследовательский университет «Высшая школа экономики»РоссияNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsRussian Federation20242606202432826Copyright © Семенова М.С., 20242024Семенова М.С.Semenova M.S.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.gp-mgimo.ru/jour/article/view/63

Статья посвящена анализу современных российских и зарубежных экспертных взглядов на проблематику расширения БРИКС. Использованы работы, которые были опубликованы не ранее 2020 года. Исследование очерчивает поле для продолжения дискуссии о преимуществах присоединения новых стран-участниц к одному из самых перспективных международных объединений. В статье также очерчены возникающие трудности, возникающие в процессе расширения формата, и оцениваются способы их преодоления.

The article is devoted to the analysis of Russian and foreign expert views on BRICS expansion. The expert analytics analyzed in the article have been published no earlier than 2020. The study outlines the framework for continuing discussion about the benefits of new participating countries joining one of the most promising international associations. The article also outlines the emerging challenges accompanying the process of BRICS expansion and evaluates ways to overcome them.

БРИКСстратегия развития БРИКСрасширение БРИКСНовый банк развитиямногополярностьмировая политикаBRICSBRICS development strategyBRICS expansionNew Development Bankmultipolarityworld politicsReferencesAcharya, A. (2017). After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31, 271–285.Acharya, A. (2017). After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31, 271–285.Baskaran, G., & Cahill, B. (2023). Six New BRICS: Implications for Energy Trade. Center for Strategic and International Studies.Baskaran, G., & Cahill, B. (2023). Six New BRICS: Implications for Energy Trade. Center for Strategic and International Studies.Bradshaw, M. J. (2014). Global Energy Dilemmas: Energy Security, Globalization, and Climate Change. Polity, Cambridge.Bradshaw, M. J. (2014). Global Energy Dilemmas: Energy Security, Globalization, and Climate Change. Polity, Cambridge.Ciccantell, P. S., Smithm D. & Sowers, E. (2023). Trade Wars and Disrupted Global Commodity Chains: Hallmarks of the Breakdown of the U.S. World Order and a New Era of Competition and Conflict? Journal of World-Systems Research, 29, 457–479.Ciccantell, P. S., Smithm D. & Sowers, E. (2023). Trade Wars and Disrupted Global Commodity Chains: Hallmarks of the Breakdown of the U.S. World Order and a New Era of Competition and Conflict? Journal of World-Systems Research, 29, 457–479.Cooper, F. (2002). Africa since 1940: the Past of the Present. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Cooper, F. (2002). Africa since 1940: the Past of the Present. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.Duggan, N., & Arapova, E. (2022). Introduction: ‘The BRICS, Global Governance, and Challenges for South–South Cooperation in a Post-Western World.’ International Political Science Review, 43(4), 469–480. DOI: 10.1177/01925121211052211Duggan, N., & Arapova, E. (2022). Introduction: ‘The BRICS, Global Governance, and Challenges for South–South Cooperation in a Post-Western World.’ International Political Science Review, 43(4), 469–480. DOI: 10.1177/01925121211052211Friedman, G. (2010). The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century. Anchor.Friedman, G. (2010). The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century. Anchor.Godart, O., Abel, P., Bode, E., Heimann, T., Herrmann, C., Kamin, K., Peterson, S. & Sandkamp, A. (2023). Resilienz der Langfriststrategie Deutschlands zum Klimaschutz. Kiel: Kiel Institute for the World Economy.Godart, O., Abel, P., Bode, E., Heimann, T., Herrmann, C., Kamin, K., Peterson, S. & Sandkamp, A. (2023). Resilienz der Langfriststrategie Deutschlands zum Klimaschutz. Kiel: Kiel Institute for the World Economy.Hobson, J. & S. Zhang (2022). The Return of the Chinese Tribute System? Re-viewing the Belt and Road Initiative. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(4). DOI: 10.1093/isagsq/ksac074Hobson, J. & S. Zhang (2022). The Return of the Chinese Tribute System? Re-viewing the Belt and Road Initiative. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(4). DOI: 10.1093/isagsq/ksac074Inkster, N. (2020). The Great Decoupling: China, America and the Struggle for Technological Supremacy. Hurst & Company, London.Inkster, N. (2020). The Great Decoupling: China, America and the Struggle for Technological Supremacy. Hurst & Company, London.Larionova, M. & Shelepov, A. (2022). BRICS, G20 and Global Economic Governance Reform. International Political Science Review, 43(4), 512–530. DOI: 10.1177/01925121211035122Larionova, M. & Shelepov, A. (2022). BRICS, G20 and Global Economic Governance Reform. International Political Science Review, 43(4), 512–530. DOI: 10.1177/01925121211035122Macaes, B. (2021). Geopolitics for the End Time: From the Pandemic to the Climate Crisis. Hurst, London.Macaes, B. (2021). Geopolitics for the End Time: From the Pandemic to the Climate Crisis. Hurst, London.Schindler, S., Alami, I., Dicarlo, J. et al. (2023). The Second Cold War: USChina Competition for Centrality in Infrastructure, Digital, Production, and Finance Networks. Geopolitics, DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2023.2253432Schindler, S., Alami, I., Dicarlo, J. et al. (2023). The Second Cold War: USChina Competition for Centrality in Infrastructure, Digital, Production, and Finance Networks. Geopolitics, DOI: 10.1080/14650045.2023.2253432Taylor, I. (2017). Global Governance and Transnationalizing Capitalist Hegemony: The Myth of the ‘Emerging Powers’. Routledge, London and New York.Taylor, I. (2017). Global Governance and Transnationalizing Capitalist Hegemony: The Myth of the ‘Emerging Powers’. Routledge, London and New York.Taylor, I. & Cheng, Z. X. (2022). China as a ‘Rising Power’: Why the Status Quo Matters. Third World Quarterly, 43, 244–258.Taylor, I. & Cheng, Z. X. (2022). China as a ‘Rising Power’: Why the Status Quo Matters. Third World Quarterly, 43, 244–258.Verhoeven, H. & Woldemariam, M. (2022). Who Lost Ethiopia? The Unmaking of an African Anchor State and U.S. Foreign Policy. Contemporary Security Policy, 43, 622–650.Verhoeven, H. & Woldemariam, M. (2022). Who Lost Ethiopia? The Unmaking of an African Anchor State and U.S. Foreign Policy. Contemporary Security Policy, 43, 622–650.Zhao, H. & Lesage D. (2020). Explaining BRICS outreach: Motivations and institutionalization. International Organisations Research Journal, 15(2), 93–124.Zhao, H. & Lesage D. (2020). Explaining BRICS outreach: Motivations and institutionalization. International Organisations Research Journal, 15(2), 93–124.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.