Preview

Governance and Politics

Advanced search

Cold War 1.0 and Cold War 2.0: Comparative Analysis

https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2025-4-2-43-50

Abstract

Many international experts believe that the world has entered a new Cold War. There are, however, significant differences between Cold War 1.0 and Cold War 2.0. Firstly, while the first Cold War (1945-1991) was fought in a bipolar world, the world is now polycentric – and this is an objective reality. Secondly, the nature of the ideological struggle has changed. During Cold War 1.0, it was a struggle between liberal globalism and Marxism-Leninism. Now we can talk about a confrontation between liberal globalism and the bourgeois nationalisms of the leading non-Western centers of power (Russia, China, etc.). Thirdly, during the first Cold War, it was the Soviet-American dialogue on strategic nuclear arms control that became the driving force behind the easing of international tensions (1970s-1980s). Today, the changing strategic nuclear balance does not give ground to believe that the dialogue on strategic weapons between Moscow and Washington will become the locomotive of a new détente. A new détente of the 21st century (like the first détente of the 20th century) will become possible only under conditions of weakening of the ideological struggle in the international arena.

About the Author

V. I. Batyuk
Georgy Arbatov Institute for U.S. and Canada Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Vladimir I. Batyuk, Georgy Arbatov Institute for U.S. and Canada Studies

2/3, Khlebny pereulok, Moscow



References

1. Russia and the United States in the Evolving World Order. (2018). Ed. by Anatoly Torkunov, Norma C. Noonan, Tatiana Shakleina. Moscow: MGIMO University.

2. Tirpak, J. (2021). Strategic Command Needs New Three-Way Deterrence Model, Deputy

3. Commander Says. Air Force Magazine. Aug. 27. URL: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/strategic-command-new-three-way-nuclear-deterrence-model/ (accessed: 01.12.2024). Batyuk, V.I. (2016). Istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy [History of International Relations]. Moscow: Yurayt. (In Russian)

4. Batyuk, V.I. (2023). Podkhody SSHA k sderzhivaniyu Rossii i Kitaya (po materialam dokumentov strategicheskogo planirovaniya administratsii Dzh. Baydena) [US Approaches to Containing Russia and China (Based on the Strategic Planning Documents of the Biden Administration)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 25. Mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya i mirovaya politika, 2. (In Russian)

5. Bzhezinskiy, Z. (2017). Krizis mirovoy vlasti i troystvennyy soyuz SSHA, Kitaya i Rossii [The Crisis of World Power and the Triple Alliance of the USA, China, and Russia]. Rossiya v global’noy politike. 9.01. URL: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/global-processes/Krizis-mirovoi-vlasti-itroistvennyi-soyuz-SShA-Kitaya-i-Rossii-18528 (accessed 01.02.2022). (In Russian)

6. Lukin, A.V. (2016). Novaya mezhdunarodnaya ideokratiya i Rossiya [The New International Ideocracy and Russia]. Comparative Politics Russia, 1(22). (In Russian)

7. Safranchuk, I. (2016). Bezradostnyy landshaft. Ekspertnyye mneniya v SSHA po rossiysko-amerikanskim otnosheniyam i napravleniya ikh razvitiya [Bleak Landscape. Expert Opinions in the USA on Russian-American Relations and Directions of Their Development]. Rossiya v global’noy politike, 2. URL: http://www.globalaffairs.ru/number/Bezradostnyi-landshaft-18029 (accessed 01.12.2024) (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Batyuk V.I. Cold War 1.0 and Cold War 2.0: Comparative Analysis. Governance and Politics. 2025;4(2):43-50. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2025-4-2-43-50

Views: 21


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-7062 (Print)
ISSN 2782-7070 (Online)