“Fields of Ideas” for Science Diplomacy in the context of Russian “Pivot to East”
https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2023-2-3-25-45
Abstract
The crisis in Russian relations with the West has become a key trigger for a real “Pivot to East” in Russian foreign policy. The new edition of the Foreign Policy Concept of the Russian Federation, approved by the Decree of the President of Russia dated March 31, 2023, proclaims and describes this turn in sufficient detail, expanding the space for scientific diplomacy within the framework of international humanitarian cooperation. This space is filled with “fields of ideas” that are formed within the framework of the relationship of the expert community with decision makers within the country and with foreign colleagues and partners. These “fields of ideas” are currently rather poorly organized “exhibitions of ideas” than “markets of ideas”, where their active production and exchange takes place. The study of the reasons for this using the tools of institutional constructivism, discursive institutionalism and “institutional logic” allowed us to identify the problems of their functioning and possible prospects for development. The latter require the active development of Russian and international “fields of ideas” within the framework of scientific diplomacy in a competitive format, while being ready to compete with both Western and “non-Western” actors. On the way of such transformation, there may be several institutional traps and dead ends, on the successful overcoming of which the success of such a transformation will depend.
Keywords
science diplomacy,
pivot to east,
think tanks,
policy ideas,
discursive institutionalism,
institutional logic,
knowledge regime
Supporting agencies: the article has been prepared in the framework of the research project “The role of think tanks and expert communities in the development of scientific diplomacy in relations with the countries of the “global South” in terms of shaping the role of Russia in the world and the image of the future of Russia” with the support of the Ministry of Education and Science of Russia and the Expert Institute for Social Research (№123091200069-1)
About the Author
M. V. Vilisov
Institute of Scientific Information in Social Sciences Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute for International Studies, MGIMO University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maksim V. Vilisov, Candidate of Political Sciences, Leading Researcher, Center for Interdisciplinary Studies Institute of Scientific Information in Social Sciences Russian Academy of Sciences; Senior Researcher, Institute for International Studies, MGIMO University
References
1. Bordachev, T.V. & Pyatachkova, A.S. (2018). The Eurasian Cooperation Agenda. The Concept of Greater Eurasia in the Turn of Russia to the East. International Organisations Research Journal, 3, 33–51. DOI: 10.17323/1996-7845-2018-03-02
2. Campbell, J.L. (1998). Institutional Analysis and the Role of Ideas in Political Economy. Theory and society, 3, 377–409.
3. Campbell, J.L., Pedersen, O.K. (2011) Knowledge Regimes and Comparative Political Economy. In D. Béland & R. Cox (Eds.), Ideas and politics in social science research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. 167–190.
4. Carstensen, M. & Schmidt, V. (2016). Power through, over and in Ideas: Conceptualizing Ideational Power in Discursive Institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 3, 318–337. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
5. Drezner, D. (2017). The Ideas Industry: How Pessimists, Partisans, and Plutocrats Are Transforming the Marketplace of Ideas. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 360 p.
6. Reinhardt, R.O. (2021). Russian Science Diplomacy at a Crossroads: Positive and Normative Analysis. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 2, 92–106. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2021-2-77-92-106
7. Asmolov, K.V. & Zakharova, L.V. (2023). Reshitel’nost’ i akkuratnost’ [Decisiveness and Accuracy]. Rossiya v global’noy politike, 4, 203–224. DOI: 10.31278/1810-6439-2023-21-4-203-224 (In Russian)
8. Bourdieu, P. (2007). Sotsiologiya sotsial’nogo prostranstva [Sociology of Social Space]. Transl. and ed. by N.A.Shmatko. Saint Petersburg: Aleteyya. 288 p. (In Russian)
9. Denisov, I.E. (2020). Kontseptsiya «diskursivnoy sily» i transformatsiya kitayskoy vneshney politiki pri Si TSzin’pine [The Concept of ‘Discursive Power’ and the Transformation of Chinese Foreign Policy under Xi Jinping]. Comparative Politics Russia, 4, 42–52. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10047 (In Russian)
10. Karaganov, S.A. & Makarov, I.A. (2015). Povorot na vostok: itogi i zadachi [Turning to the East: Results and Tasks]. Zhurnal Sibirskogo federal’nogo universiteta. Seriya: gumanitarnyye nauki, 8, 6–10. (In Russian)
11. Nosov, M.G. (2019). Povorot na Vostok: itogi pyati let [Turn to the East: Results of Five Years]. Nauchno-analiticheskiy vestnik Institut Yevropy RAN, 2, 6–13. DOI:10.15211/vestnikieran22019612 (In Russian)
12. Savchenko, A.E. & Zuenko, I.Yu. (2020). Dvizhushchiye sily rossiyskogo povorota na Vostok (The Driving Forces of Russia’s Pivot to East). Comparative Politics Russia, 1, 111–125. DOI: 10.24411/2221-3279-2020-10009 (In Russian)
13. Shmerlina, I.A. (2016). «Institutsional’naya logika»: kriticheskiĭ analiz napravleniya [“Institutional Logic”: Critical Analysis of the Direction]. Sotsiologicheskiy Zhurnal, 4, 110–138. DOI: 10.19181/socjour.2016.22.4.4812 (In Russian)
14. Torkunov A.V. (2020). Rasshiryaya predely sotsiogumanitarnogo poznaniya mira [Expanding the Limits of Socio-Humanitarian Knowledge of the World]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya, Sotsiologiya, 3, 694–703. DOI: 10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-3-694-703 (In Russian)
15. Torkunov, A.V. & Strel’tsov, D.V. (2023). Rossiyskaya politika povorota na Vostok: problemy i riski [Russian Policy of Turning to the East: Problems and Risks]. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otnosheniya, 4, 5–16. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-4-5-16 (In Russian)
16. Torkunov, A.V.; Strel’tsov, D.V. & Koldunova E.V. (2020). Rossiyskiy povorot na Vostok: dostizheniya, problemy i perspektivy [Russian Turn to the East: Achievements, Problems and Prospects]. Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya, 5, 8–21. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2020.05.02 (In Russian)
17. Vilisov, M.V. (2023). «Fabriki mysli» ili «kuznitsy idey»? Tsennostnaya povestka analiticheskikh tsentrov stran YEAES v kontekste gosudarstvennoy politiki [«Think Tanks» or «Forges of Ideas»? The Value Agenda of the EAEU Countries’ Think Tanks in the Public Policy Framework]. Politicheskaya nauka, 2, 203–233. DOI: 10.31249/poln/2023.02.09 (In Russian)
Review
For citations:
Vilisov M.V. “Fields of Ideas” for Science Diplomacy in the context of Russian “Pivot to East”. Governance and Politics. 2023;2(3):25-45. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2023-2-3-25-45
Views:
387
Email this article 