Significant Roles of Small States in Contemporary World Politics: Cases of the Small Monarchies of the Middle East
https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2024-3-4-42-67
Abstract
The article is concerned with the application of the concept of international roles for small states occupying the bottom floor of the international hierarchy. As is known, traditionally small states are characterized by low status, essential lack of influence on international affairs and complete dependence on great powers. At the same time, taking into account the sheer size of the group, it is possible to identify a subgroup of small states that are able to effectively employ their available resources and play a comparable role with middle or even great powers in world politics. In order to identify significant international roles, a typology is proposed that takes into account the main spheres of international interaction and the type of reference object for which the state in question plays a significant role (global, regional or dyadic levels). Such systematization of significant roles allows comparing vastly different countries, for instance, those belonging to different classes of the international hierarchy, including small, medium and leading states. In addition, the axis of reference objects in the typology allows to reflect an important sociological component of a role, which distinguishes it from a function. Based on the proposed typology of significant international roles, the article goes on to analyze the transformation of the roles of small Middle Eastern monarchies – namely, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain in contemporary world politics, which constitute some of the most successful examples of small states that have achieved significant agency at the beginning of the 21st century.
About the Author
B. A. Barabash
Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Bogdan A. Barabash, Deputy Head of the Section of Projects and State Programs, the Department of State Support for Art and National Art
Maly Gnezdnikovsky per., 7/6, building 1,2, GSP-3, Moscow, 125993
References
1. Aydin, U. (2019). Ruletakers, Rulemakers, or Rulepromoters? Turkey and Mexico’s role as rising middle powers in global economic governance. Regulation & Governance, 3 ,544–560. DOI: 10.1111/rego.12269
2. Breuning, M. (1996). Words and Deeds: Foreign Assistance Rhetoric and Policy Behavior in the Netherlands, Belgium, and the United Kingdom. International Studies Quarterly, 39(2), 235–254.
3. Colomer, J.M. (2007). Great Empires, Small Nations: The Uncertain Future of the Sovereign State. Routledge, 128 p.
4. Esposito, J. (2003). Al-Jazeera: How the Free Arab News Network Scooped the World and Changed the Middle East. Political Science Quarterly, 118, 316–318. DOI: 10.2307/30035745.
5. Hansel, M. & Möller, M. (2015). Indian Foreign Policy and International Humanitarian Norms: A Role-Theoretical Analysis. Asian Politics & Policy, 1, 79–104. DOI: 10.1111/aspp.12171
6. Holsti, K.J. (1970). National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy. International Studies Quarterly, 14(3), 233–309. DOI: 10.2307/3013584
7. Kamrava, M. (2011). Mediation and Qatari Foreign policy. The Middle East Journal, 65, 539–556. DOI: 10.3751/65.4.11
8. Long, T.A. (2022). Small State’s Guide to Influence in World Politics. Oxford University Press, 221 p.
9. Makhzoumi, F. (2010). Lebanon’s Crisis of Sovereignty. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 52(2), 5–12. DOI: 10.1080/00396331003764298
10. Mares, D. (1988). Middle Powers under Regional Hegemony: To Challenge or Acquiesce in Hegemonic Enforcement. International Studies Quarterly, 32(4), 453–471. DOI:10.2307/2600593
11. Paul, T.V., Larson, D.W. & Wohlforth, W.C. (2014). Status in World Politics. Cambridge University Press, 320 p.
12. Putnam, R.D. (1998). Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-Level Games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460. DOI: 10.1017/S0020818300027697
13. Balakhova, Z.O. (2016). Kontseptsiya roli vo vneshnei politike sovremennogo gosudarstva [The concept of role in the foreign policy of a modern state]. Nauka i mir, 2(35), 2–9. (In Russian).
14. Bogaturov, A.D. (1997). Velikie derzhavy na Tikhom okeane. Istoriya i teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii v Vostochnoi Azii posle Vtoroi mirovoi voiny (1945-1995) [Great powers in the Pacific Ocean. History and theory of international relations in East Asia after World War II (1945-1995)]. Konvert, 352 p. (In Russian).
15. Demidov, K.B. (2022). Katar – narozhdayushchayasya regional’naya “sverkhderzhava” i ee vnutrennie problemy [Qatar – an emerging regional “superpower” and its internal problems]. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki. Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 9, Vostokovedenie i afrikanistika: Referativnyi zhurnal, 4, 35–51. (In Russian).
16. Zhilina, I.Yu. (2020). Proval ehkonomicheskoi blokady Katara. [The failure of the economic blockade of Qatar]. Sotsial’nye i gumanitarnye nauki: Otechestvennaya i zarubezhnaya literatura. Ser. 2, Ekonomika: Referativnyi zhurnal, 2, 41–52. (In Russian).
17. Il’in, M.V. (2011). Al’ternativnye formy suverennoi gosudarstvennosti. [Alternative forms of sovereign statehood]. Comparative Politics Russia, 3(5), 11–19. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2011-2-3(5)-11-19 (In Russian).
18. Smirnov, V.A. (2015). Problemy vybora vneshnepoliticheskoi nishi malymi gosudarstvami (na primere stran Baltii) [Problems of choosing a foreign policy niche by small states (on the example of the Baltic States)]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 6(45), 135–145. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2015-6-45-135-145 (In Russian).
19. Surkov, N.Yu. (2024). Razryadka v Zalive i kurs na Evraziyu. Blizhnii Vostok prevrashchaetsya v odin iz novykh mirovykh polyusov [Détente in the Gulf and the course to Eurasia. The Middle East is turning into one of the new world poles]. Svobodnaya mysl’, 1(1703), 85-96. DOI: 10.24412/0869-4435-2024-1-85-96 (In Russian).
20. Chumakov, A.N. (2023). Globalizatsiya. Kontury tselostnogo mira. [Globalization. Contours of a holistic world]. Prospekt, 456 p. (In Russian).
Review
For citations:
Barabash B.A. Significant Roles of Small States in Contemporary World Politics: Cases of the Small Monarchies of the Middle East. Governance and Politics. 2024;3(4):42-67. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2024-3-4-42-67
Views:
131
Email this article 