Sanctions and Russian Identity Construction: A Constructivist Study on Sanctions as a Normative Challenge
https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2025-4-1-57-68
Abstract
The article examines Russia’s response to sanctions within a broader process of identity reconstruction after post 2022 Russia’s foreign policy realignments. The paper proceeds as follows. The first section reviews the literature situating this study within existing debates on sanctions, identity, and Russian foreign policy. The second section outlines the constructivist theoretical framework, emphasizing how normative pressures shape state identities. The third section examines how Russia’s leadership discourse, official rhetoric, and policy decisions reflect identity-driven responses to sanctions. The fourth and fifth sections examine Russia’s deepening diplomatic and economic engagements with China and the Global South. The article concludes that the constructivist perspective explains Russia’s diplomatic and economic realignment as a major shift for global governance and international order based on principles of sovereignty, non-interference, and resistance to Western liberal hegemony.
About the Author
Li Huan
Institute of China and Modern Asia of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Li Huan – Post-graduate student
Nakhimovsky pr., 32, Moscow, 117997
References
1. Belousova, T. (2024). Understanding the dynamics of the South Africa–Russia relations through the constructivist concept of ‘State’s Identity.’ African and Asian Studies, 1(aop), 1-31. Doi: 10.1163/15692108-bja10035.
2. Drezner, D.W. (2011). Sanctions are sometimes smart: Targeted sanctions in theory and practice. International studies review, 13(1), 96-108. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2486.2010.01001.x.
3. Feklyunina, V. (2018). International norms and identity. In Routledge Handbook of Russian foreign policy, Routledge, 5-21.
4. Finnemore, M. and Sikkink, K. (1998) International Norm Dynamics and Political Change, International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2601361.
5. Forsberg, T., Heller, R. and Wolf, R. (2014). Status and emotions in Russian foreign policy. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 47(3-4), 261-268. DOI: 10.1016/j.postcomstud.2014.09.007.
6. Keohane, R. (2011). Neoliberal institutionalism. In Security Studies, Routledge, 157-164.
7. Khan, A.M. (2025). Navigating the China-Russia Alliance: A New Paradigm in International Relations. Contemporary Journal of Social Science Review, 3(1), 334-344. Available at: https://contemporaryjournal.com/index.php/14/article/view/312.
8. Kirkham, K. (2022). The political economy of sanctions: Resilience and transformation in Russia and Iran. Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Korolev, A. (2022) China-Russia Strategic Alignment in International Politics. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press. doi:10.5117/9789463725248.
10. Leichtova, M.B. (2016). Sanctions in Russian political narrative. Politics in Central Europe, 12(1), 111-145. DOI: 10.1515/pce-2016-0007.
11. Lewis, D. (2022). The Role of Ideology in Russian Foreign Policy. In The Routledge Handbook of Ideology and International Relations, Routledge, 374-390.
12. Miskimmon, A., O’Loughlin, B., & Roselle, L. (2018). Strategic Narrative: 21st Century Diplomatic Statecraft / Narrativa estratégica : el arte de la diplomacia en el siglo XXI. Revista Mexicana de Política Exterior, 113. https://revistadigital.sre.gob.mx/images/stories/numeros/n113/miskimmonoloughlinrosellei.pdf
13. Mitzen, J. (2006). Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European journal of international relations, 12(3), 341-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066106067346.
14. Panke, D. and Petersohn, U. (2016). Norm challenges and norm death: The inexplicable? Cooperation and Conflict, 51(1), 3-19. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0010836715597948.
15. Silaev, N. (2022). Russia and its allies in three strategic environments. Europe-Asia Studies, 74(4), 598-619. DOI: 10.1080/09668136.2021.1887087.
16. Soluianov, V.S.(2021). The concept of multipolarity: diversity of approaches and interpretations. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 23(3), 424-445. Available at: https://journals.rudn.ru/political-science/article/view/27307.
17. The Observatory of Economic Complexity (OEC) (n.d.) China (CHN) and Russia (RUS) trade relationship. Available at: https://oec.world/en/profile/bilateral-country/chn/partner/rus.
18. Tsygankov, A.P. (2022) Russia’s Foreign Policy: Change and Continuity in National Identity. 5th ed. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
19. Wendt, A. (1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Xu, Z. (2024). The Impact of the Russian-Ukrainian Conflict on the Hegemonic Position of the Dollar. Highlights in Business, Economics and Management, 24, 581-587.
Review
For citations:
Huan L. Sanctions and Russian Identity Construction: A Constructivist Study on Sanctions as a Normative Challenge. Governance and Politics. 2025;4(1):57-68. https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2025-4-1-57-68
Views:
178
Email this article 