Preview

Governance and Politics

Advanced search

Foreign Policy Management in Turkey

https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2026-5-2-10-22

Abstract

The article analyzes the system of foreign policy management in Turkey under the presidential form of government established following the constitutional reforms of 2017. The author emphasizes that the transition to a centralized model has led to the formation of a hybrid decision-making structure that combines formal institutions (the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the National Security Council, the Grand National Assembly of Turkey, and the National Intelligence Organization [MİT]) with informal networks (presidential advisors, business associations, and religious foundations). The aim of the study is to systematize knowledge about the actors and mechanisms shaping Turkey’s foreign policy course. The methodological foundation of the research comprises institutional and systemic-structural analysis, as well as examination of the legal and regulatory framework. The study reveals that the current foreign policy management system exhibits symbiotic features of both Eastern and Western approaches to conducting foreign policy: alongside a centralized «core» of decision-making characteristic of Eastern models, institutional formations typical of Western systems also persist. Ultimately, this combination results in a degree of unpredictability and complicates the forecasting of foreign policy steps taken by the Republic of Turkey.

About the Author

V. A. Avatkov
Institute of Scientific Information for Social Sciences of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation

Vladimir A. Avatkov, Head of the Department of the Middle and Post-Soviet East

117418, Moscow, Nakhimovsky Prospekt, 51/21



References

1. Acar, K. (2020). Turkey: The Rise and Fall of the Influence of the Military in Politics. In Oxford Encyclopedia of the Military in Politics. Oxford University Press.

2. Alanoğlu, H. (2025). Demokrat parti dönemi türk diş politikasi (1950-1960). Journal of Anglo-Turkish Relations, 6(2), 59–78.

3. Demirkol, Ö. (2006). Civil society as foreign policy actor: the case of TÜSİAD. Bülkent University. 130 p.

4. Erdağ, R. (2014). Türkiye Dış Politikası: İlkeler, Aktörler, Uygulamalar. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 10(40), 172–178.

5. Sarra, L. & Melouk, A. (2021). Turkish Foreign Policy under the Justice and Development Party (AKP): Between kemalism and Neo-Ottomanism. Academic Journal of Legal and Political Researchs, 5, 67–75.

6. Avatkov, V. A. & Sbitneva, A. I. (2023). Odin v pole ne voin: vedushchie ChVK Turtsii [One man is no fighter in the field: Leading private military companies of Turkey]. Puti k miruibezopasnosti, 2(65), 219–232. (In Russian)

7. Avatkov, V.A., Sbitneva, A.I. (2022). Partiinaya sistema i politicheskie partii Turetskoi Respubliki [Party system and political parties of the Turkish Republic]. Grazhdanin. Vybory. Vlast’, 2(24), 77–90. (In Russian)

8. Dimitrova, S.V. (2008). Osobennosti celerealizacii v zapadnyh i vostochnyh strategiyah [Features of aims-achieving in western and eastern strategies]. Izvestiya Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, (3), 25–29. (In Russian)

9. Velieva, L.E. (2025). Deyatel’nost’ turetskogo prosvetitel’skogo Fonda Maarif (na primere stran Tsentral’noi Azii) [Activities of the Turkish educational Maarif Foundation (the case of Central Asian countries)]. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Obshchestvennye nauki, 1(858), 27–32. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Avatkov V.A. Foreign Policy Management in Turkey. Governance and Politics. 2026;5(2):10-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2026-5-2-10-22

Views: 23

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-7062 (Print)
ISSN 2782-7070 (Online)