Preview

Governance and Politics

Advanced search

Problems and Prospects of Using Cultural Diplomacy Instruments in the Context of the Institutionalization of BRICS

https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2025-4-4-25-47

Abstract

Cultural cooperation is becoming a key domain of BRICS activity. The less politicized nature of such interaction is leading to the active development of cultural diplomacy mechanisms within the grouping. This trend creates opportunities for the broader institutionalization of BRICS interaction formats. The authors of this article hypothesize that cultural diplomacy within

BRICS has become a distinct area of activity, facilitating further economic rapprochement, institutional strengthening of economic relations among the association’s member states, ideological justification for the need to delegate some state sovereignty, and the development of public support for BRICS. Theoretically, the study draws on the ideas of neoinstitutionalism and constructivism, which emphasize the normative, ideological, and symbolic aspects of the emergence of formal institutions. In the context of BRICS enlargement and the increasing diversity of the group’s membership, cultural diplomacy appears not only as a tool for harmonizing this diversity through the formation of a system of shared meanings, but also as a mechanism for the gradual institutionalization of BRICS. The authors’ analysis of BRICS cultural diplomacy demonstrates that the groups countries view it not only as a tool for strengthening mutual understanding between their nations but also take a pragmatic approach to harnessing its potential. Cultural interaction is closely linked to shared economic objectives of enhancing BRICS competitiveness, a unified approach to global order, and a desire to uphold the idea of cultural and civilizational diversity. The authors found that the various areas of cultural diplomacy (cinema diplomacy, fashion diplomacy, museum diplomacy, and gastrodiplomacy) are not disparate cultural sub-spheres, but rather a set of interconnected, economically beneficial areas that highlight the cultural richness of each BRICS country. Major events organized through cultural diplomacy, in addition to promoting traditional agendas, help attract investment and strengthen business ties within the BRICS space. It appears that this symbiosis of culture and economics serves the interests of the BRICS countries. The development of cultural diplomacy institutions in this context creates a platform for the institutionalization of communication formats within BRICS in new areas.

About the Authors

Leili R. Rustamova
MGIMO University; IMEMO RAS
Россия

Leili R. Rustamova, Ph.D. (Political Science), Associate Professor, World Politics Department, School of Governance and Politics;  Research Fellow at the Center for Post-Soviet Studies, 

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454.



Bahri Kh. Bahriev
Moscow Metropolitan Governance Yury Luzhkov University; MGIMO University
Россия

Bahri Kh. Bahriev, Ph.D. (Political Science), Associate Professor, Department of Jurisprudence; Associate Professor, World Politics Department,  School of Governance and Politics,

28, Sretenka Street, Moscow, 107045;

76, Prospect Vernadskogo, Moscow, 119454.



References

1. Bruno, N. (2019). Políticas Culturais dos Países do BRICS no período de 2003 a 2018: uma análise comparativa [Cultural Policies of the BRICS Countries from 2003 to 2018: a comparative analysis]. Políticas Culturais em Revista - Cultural Policies in Review, 12(1), 157–186. (In Portuguese)

2. Cooke, P. (2016). Soft Power, Film Culture and the BRICS. New Cinemas, 14 (1), 3–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/ncin.14.1.3_2

3. Ganeeva, L., Nikiforova, A. (2024). BRICS+ Digital Diplomacy for Russia’s Olympic Movement Development. BRICS Journal of Economics, 55–71. DOl: 10.3897/brics-econ.5.el 32092

4. Gregory, B. (2008). Public Diplomacy: Sunrise of an Academic Field. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 274–290. DOI: 10.1177/0002716207311723 Hay, C. (2006). Constructivist institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 56–74.

5. Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security, 171–200.

6. Hudson, V. (Ed). 1997. Culture & Foreign Policy. Boulder: Lynn Rienner Publishers, 1997, 28–29.

7. Kumar, R. & Thomas, B. (2022). BRICS in Global Governance: A Gradual but Steady Expansion. Governance and Politics, 1(1), 100–113. DOI: 10.24833/2782-7062-2022-1-1-100-113

8. Kurumchina, A. (2020). The Challenges of Assessment: The Projects of BRICS Cultural Diplomacy. KnE Social Sciences. DOI: 10.18502/kss.v4i11.7537

9. Lee, B.T., Kornphetcharat, K. & Sims, J. P. (2025). Soft power: BRICS cultural diplomacy and the rebalancing of global narratives. International Review of Humanities Studies. DOI: 10.7454/ irhs.v10i2.1418

10. March, J. & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics, New York, Free Press, 227 p.

11. Mercuro, N. & Medema, S. (2006). Institutional Law and Economics. Economics and the Law: From Posner to Postmodernism and Beyond. The 2-nd edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 208–240.

12. Sreechandra, K. (2021). Cultural Diplomacy: Connecting BRICS Nations through Art, Heritage, and Exchange. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education, 13, 1030-1033. DOI: 10.48047/INT-JECSE/V13I1.211253

13. Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 429 p.

14. Artamonova, U. & Rustamova, L. (2023). “Otmena” Rossii: posledstvija dlja kul’turnoj diplomatii [“Canceling” Russia: Implications for Cultural Diplomacy]. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 67 (4), 123–131. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2023-67-4-123-131. (In Russian)

15. Bogatyreva, O.N., Kovba D.M. & Tabarinceva-Romanova K.M. (2022). Mezhcivilizacionnyj dialog kak instrument gumanitarnoj diplomatii stran BRIKS [Intercivilizational dialogue as a tool of humanitarian diplomacy in the BRICS countries]. Diskurs-Pi, 3, 101–121. DOI: 10.17506/18179568_2022_19_3_101. (In Russian)

16. Dmitrieva, V.A. (2023). Perspektivy gumanitarnoj diplomatii stran BRIKS v Latinskoj Amerike posle rasshireniya gruppy [Prospects for BRICS humanitarian diplomacy in Latin America after the group’s expansion]. Governance and Politics, 2(4), 24–36. DOI: 10.24833/2782-7062-20232-4-24-36. (In Russian)

17. Guruleva, T.L. & Bedareva N.I. (2019). Sotrudnichestvo Rossii i Kitaja v oblasti sozdanija setevyh universitetov i sovmestnyh obrazovatel’nyh uchrezhdenij [Cooperation between Russia and China in the Creation of Network Universities and Joint Educational Institutions]. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia. 28 (4). P. 108–123. DOI: 10.31992/0869-3617-2019-28-4-108-123 (In Russian)

18. Ignatov, A.A. 2019. Sammit BRIKS v Iokhannesburge: bol’she novykh mekhanizmov i men’she konkretnykh reshenii [BRICS Summit in Johannesburg: More Instruments and Fewer Decisions]. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 19 (1), 89–99. DOI: 10.22363/2313-06602019-19-1-89-99 (In Russian)

19. Jabbari Nasir, H. (2017). Otnoshenie islamskih institutov k bor’be s mezhdunarodnym terrorizmom [The attitude of Islamic institutions towards the fight against international terrorism]. Comparative Politics Russia, 8(4), 42–59. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2017-8-4-42-59. (In Russian)

20. Koldunova, E.V. (2014). Rol’ stran BRIKS v global’nom upravlenii [The role of BRICS countries in global governance]. Comparative Politics Russia, 5 (1), 14, 60–64. DOI: 10.18611/2221-32792014-5-1(14)-60-64. (In Russian)

21. Konkin, A.A. & Romanova I.V. (2021). Kinematograf kak perspektivnaja sfera razvitija politicheskogo i kul’turnogo dialoga stran BRIKS [Cinema as a promising area for the development of the political and cultural dialogue of the BRICS countries]. Transbaikal State University Journal, 5, 68–78. (In Russian)

22. Kul’pina, V. P., Morozkina, A.K., Pavlyushina, V.A. & Shuvaeva D.V. (2015). Rol’ Rossii v BRIKS v ramkah vzaimodejstviya v social’noj sfere [Russia’s role in BRICS in the framework of interaction in the social sphere]. International Organisations Research Journal, 10 (4), 49–71. (In Russian)

23. Kuznetsov, D. (2020). Setevaya tekstura mirovoj politiki: transregionalizm BRIKS [The Network Texture of World Politics: BRICS Transregionalism]. World Eсonomy and International Relations, 64 (11), 124–131. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2020-64-11-124-131. (In Russian)

24. Lebedeva, M.M. (2025). BRIKS v transformiruyushchejsya politicheskoj organizacii mira [BRICS in the Transforming Political Organization of the World]. MGIMO Review of International Relations, 18(4), 66–84. DOI: 10.24833/2071-8160-2025-4-103-66-84. (In Russian)

25. Malysheva, E.V. (2018). Vliyanie protsessov tsifrovizatsii i globalizatsii na razvitie mirovogo i rossiiskogo rynka mody [The impact of digitalization and globalization on the development of world and Russian fashion market]. Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, 1 (97), 167–173. (In Russian)

26. Naumov, A.O., Naumova A.Yu., Belousova M.V. (2023). Kul’turnaya diplomatiya gruppy BRIKS [Cultural diplomacy of the BRICS group]. Gosudarstvennoe upravlenie. Elektronnyj vestnik, 100, 7–18. DOI: 10.24412/2070-1381-2023-100-7-18. (In Russian)

27. Nikolaeva, Yu.V. & Bogolyubova, N.M. (2024). BRIKS: Ot kul’turnogo sotrudnichestva k formirovaniyu obshchej vneshnej kul’turnoj politiki [BRICS: From cultural cooperation to the formation of a common foreign cultural policy]. Latinskaya Amerika, 1, 96–110. (In Russian)

28. Pivnenko, V.Yu. (2025). Razvitie turizma stranami BRIKS na period 2024-2035 gody vozdushnym transportom [Development of tourism by BRICS countries for the period 2024-2035 by air]. Vestnik nauki, 2(2), 83, 540–549. (In Russian)

29. Revenko, N. S. (2018). Gumanizacija sotrudnichestva v ramkah BRIKS: obrazovanie, zdravoohranenie, kul’tura [Humanization of cooperation within BRICS: education, healthcare, culture]. Gorizonty ekonomiki, 4(44), 69–75. (In Russian)

30. Rustamova, L.R. & Adrianov, A.K. (2023). “Kul’tura otmeny”: konceptualizacija ponjatija i ego ispol’zovanie vo vneshnej politike [Cancel culture: conceptualization of the term and its use in foreign policy]. Polis. Political Studies. 4, 46–55. DOI: 10.17976/jpps/2023.04.04. (In Russian)

31. Sadykov, R.R. & Uchayev, Ye.I. (2024). Pomoshch’ shkol’nomu obrazovaniyu v povestke Novogo banka razvitiya [Assistance to School Education in the Agenda of the New Development Bank]. MGIMO Review of International Relations. 17(6), 175–204. DOI: 10.24833/20718160-2024-6-99-175-204. (In Russian)

32. Sibiryakov, I. V. (2025). Mediasammity BRIKS: istoriya formirovaniya novogo informacionnogo prostranstva [BRICS Media Summits: The History of the Formation of a New Information Space]. Vestnik YuUrGU. Seriya: Social’no-gumanitarnye nauki, 25(3), 32–37. DOI: 10.14529/ssh250304. (In Russian)

33. Sibiryakov, I.V. (2024). Mezhdunarodnaya set’ TV BRICS: pervyj opyt mediakommunikacii [International network TV BRICS: first experience in media communications.]. Politicheskaya lingvistika, 4 (106), 83–88. (In Russian)

34. Tabarinceva-Romanova, K.M. (2023). Mnogostoronnyaya kul’turnaya diplomatiya: tradicii i innovacii [Multilateral cultural diplomacy: traditions and innovations]. Governance and Politics, 2(3), 46–57. DOI: 10.24833/2782-7062-2023-2-3-46-57. (In Russian)

35. Yagya, V.S., Chukov, R.S. & Parfenenok N.L. (2016). BRIKS: evolyutsiya i konvergentsiya sil [BRICS: Evolution and Convergence of Powers]. Vestnik RUDN. International Relations, 16 (1), 7–16. (In Russian)


Review

For citations:


Rustamova L.R., Bahriev B.Kh. Problems and Prospects of Using Cultural Diplomacy Instruments in the Context of the Institutionalization of BRICS. Governance and Politics. 2025;4(4):25-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2025-4-4-25-47

Views: 53

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2782-7062 (Print)
ISSN 2782-7070 (Online)